Navigate / search

Upcoming Seminar! “The Cancer Diathesis Revisited – 20 Years Later”

SAVE THE DATE! The Mueller’s First LIVE, IN PERSON SEMINAR

November 1-3, 2019 in the Greater Asheville, NC area!

Come visit the beautiful smoky mountains of North Carolina – home of the famous blue ridge parkway and the Biltmore House – and spend the weekend with The Muellers! Manfred and Christina Mueller will guide you on a journey to a more thorough understand of one of the most profound clinical observations of our time.

Over the past 30 years, Manfred has been observing the clinical phenomenon called the predisposition to cancer. He wrote his first paper detailing his observations in addition to the work of other homeopaths. Now, Manfred and Christina together want to share with you observations from the last 20 years – a startling and noticeable change is catapulting forward at an alarming pace, morphing our entire society and culture as it takes place. It’s more profound and far reaching than you might think!

Discover what to look for, how to address it and what to expect in the clinical arena. Don’t miss this 2 ½ day seminar packed with priceless knowledge!

Homeopathic Cancer Treatment: Research Published from 2013 to 2017

The evidence shows that patients, not physicians, are the primary impetus for the increasing call for homeopathic cancer treatment worldwide. In the countries where homeopathic treatment is available, treatment is often provided in the absence of good professional references on homeopathic cancer drugs.

The Evidence
Scientific Studies Show Tautotherapy is an Effective Treatment for Drug-Induced and Toxic Disorders

In a previous paper we have shown that tautopathic therapy has been a product and outcome of homeopathic practice ever since the classical era of homeopathy.2 Although minor controversies about the place tautopathy ought to maintain within homeopathic practice continue to the present time…

A New Year’s Open Letter to Edzart Ernst

Dear Dr. Ernst,

 

I am posting this response to your December 24 blog post (addressed to me) here on my blog as I have doubts as to whether or not you will publish my response on your own blog…

 

We here at Homeopathic Associates and The Homeopathic College would like to thank you for your open ‘Christmas card’ and your wishes for a Happy New Year, as well as for the publicity it provided us. We have been followers of your opinions for many years now and are delighted at the opportunity to engage in a dialogue.

 

 

 

 

Read more

Quantum Entanglement in Homeopathic Trials?

Most homeopathic studies seek to investigate whether homeopathic treatment can be shown to be effective within accepted methodologies of medicine, biology, chemistry and physics. However, there are theoreticians that argue that traditional research methods are inappropriate or insufficient to assess homeopathy. Calls for employing concepts from quantum physics in support of the ultra-dilution hypothesis, i.e. to counter accusations of relative paucity of positive results from homeopathic treatment in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), are made by several of these theorists, and even from within the community of homeopathic practitioners.

 

British homeopath Lionel Milgrom likes to dazzle his audiences with complex formulas derived from quantum physics to make his points. In a 2005 article1 he examined whether RCTs are redundant for testing the efficacy of homeopathy. He had observed that RCTs had yet to deliver unequivocal results demonstrating on the efficacy (or otherwise) of homeopathic remedies and individualized homeopathic prescribing. He asked if this could be caused by an implicit assumption inherent in RCT methodology that specific effects of a remedy and any nonspecific effects of consultation are independent of each other. He postulated a patient–practitioner–remedy (PPR) entanglement model as a necessary condition of homeopathic therapeutic interaction.

 

Milgrom called for alternatives to RCTs that can take into account possible entangled specific and nonspecific effects during trials of homeopathy. He theorized that since RCTs sometimes deliver positive results for the use of homeopathic remedies, that this may be caused by residual entanglement arising from homeopathic remedy manufacture. He proposed as one possibility that a homeopathic remedy “entails the entangled intention of those involved in its preparation” citing similar arguments by others. As a second option he proposed a surviving residual entanglement from remedy production but, ironically, as the cause of so-called Memory of Water (MoW) effects. Read more